The multilateral trading system is at a defining moment. With the World Trade Organization (WTO) paralyzed by geopolitical tensions, a non-functional dispute settlement system, and stalled negotiations, Africa stands at a critical juncture. The continent, home to 42 WTO members and over a quarter of the organization’s developing country constituency, must now assert a bold, unified vision for global trade rules that serve its development priorities.
Africa’s stakes in the WTO’s future are high. The continent’s share of global trade remains below 3%, and its economies are disproportionately affected by trade disruptions, climate shocks, and systemic inequities in global value chains. As the WTO confronts calls for reform, Africa must demand more than token concessions—it must push for a structural transformation of the rules that govern global trade.
The WTO’s Dispute Settlement Mechanism (DSM), once heralded as the “crown jewel” of the multilateral system, is in crisis. The Appellate Body has been non-functional since 2019, leaving African countries without a credible forum to challenge unfair trade practices.
Despite their limited use of the DSM, African nations rely on its existence to deter coercion and ensure legal recourse. The African Group has emphasized that “a functioning, independent and effective dispute settlement system is indispensable for preserving the rights and obligations of all WTO members”
. Without it, power asymmetries deepen, and smaller economies are left vulnerable to unilateral trade measures.
Africa must demand:
The WTO’s founding Marrakesh Agreement explicitly recognizes the need to ensure that developing countries “secure a share in the growth of international trade commensurate with their development needs.” Yet, decades later, this promise remains unfulfilled.
The African Group has criticized the marginalization of development issues in WTO reform discussions, noting that “issues of development… are relegated to an afterthought”. The Doha Development Agenda, launched in 2001, remains unfinished, and special and differential treatment (S&DT) provisions are under attack.
Africa must demand:
Africa’s exclusion from key decision-making processes has long undermined its influence in the WTO. Informal “Green Room” meetings—small-group negotiations dominated by major powers—have often pre-determined outcomes without African input.
The African Group has called for “transparent, inclusive, and open-ended consultations” and warned against “reform by doing” that bypasses formal WTO bodies. Africa must insist on a member-driven, consensus-based process that respects the sovereignty and agency of all nations.
Africa must demand:
As the global economy transitions toward sustainability, new trade rules are emerging around carbon border adjustments, green subsidies, and environmental standards. These measures, if designed without African input, risk becoming new forms of protectionism.
Africa’s vast reserves of critical minerals—essential for renewable energy—offer immense potential. Yet, the continent remains locked into raw material exports, with little value captured locally. As one African negotiator noted, “we must move beyond extraction to industrialization”
Africa must demand:
WTO rules often constrain the policy tools African countries need to diversify their economies and ensure food security. From subsidies to export restrictions, the current framework favors developed economies with fiscal capacity to support their sectors.
The African Group has emphasized that “WTO rules must facilitate structural transformation, diversification, and industrialization”. This requires a rethinking of what constitutes “fair” competition in a world of unequal capacities.
Africa must demand:
Africa’s influence in the WTO is undermined by fragmentation and limited coordination. While the African Group has become more assertive, capacity constraints and overlapping memberships in other coalitions dilute its impact.
The African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) offers a platform to harmonize positions and build a common trade policy. As South Africa assumes the G20 presidency in 2025, there is a unique opportunity to elevate Africa’s voice in global trade governance.
Africa must demand:
Conclusion: A New Social Contract for Global Trade
The WTO is at a crossroads—not just institutionally, but morally. The future of global trade rules must reflect the aspirations of all countries, not just the powerful few. Africa’s demands are not about charity or exemptions—they are about justice, equity, and the right to develop.
As the world grapples with climate change, debt distress, and rising inequality, trade must be a tool for shared prosperity—not a weapon for dominance. Africa must seize this moment to reshape the WTO into an institution that works for the many, not the few.
The time for polite requests is over. Africa must demand a new social contract for global trade—one that centers development, respects sovereignty, and delivers fairness.
References
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Africa and the Great Power Competition at the World Trade Organization, March 2025.
TESS Forum, Reimagining Cooperation on Trade and Sustainability: An African Perspective, May 2025.
Third World Network, African Group Issues Key Principles on Institutional Reform of WTO, July 2023.
Stay connected with IPRA’s quarterly newsletter featuring the latest news, book releases, and original content.
Copyright © 2025 Institute of Policy Research and Analysis. All rights reserved.