Public expenditure management system in Uganda

Abstract

This paper evaluates Uganda’s public expenditure management system (PEMS) against the backdrop of two decades of reform
aimed at enhancing fiscal discipline, allocative efficiency, and service-delivery outcomes. Drawing on the 2022 Public Expenditure

and Financial Accountability (PEFA) assessment, recent Ministry of Finance policy statements, and secondary literature, we find that
Uganda has built a relatively robust PEMS anchored by (i) a Medium-Term Expenditure Framework (MTEF) that links strategic plans
to multi-year budget ceilings, (ii) an Integrated Financial Management Information System (IFMIS) that generates timely and
comprehensive fiscal reports, and (iii) a legal-institutional framework that mandates gender- and equity-responsive budgeting. These
features have yielded measurable gains: fifteen of thirty-one PEFA indicators now score “A” or “B,” signifying good or above-average
performance, while transparency to the public and predictability of transfers to sub-national governments have improved markedly
since 2016. Nevertheless, significant weaknesses persist. Revenue forecasting errors undermine budget credibility; project appraisal
and selection procedures do not yet guarantee value-for-money; internal-control enforcement is uneven, resulting in accumulation of
expenditure arrears; and medium-term budget projections often diverge from actual allocations, eroding the MTEF’s usefulness as a
planning tool. The 2025–2030 Public Financial Management Reform Strategy responds to these shortcomings by prioritizing stronger
domestic revenue mobilization, tighter commitment controls, and enhanced oversight capacity in Parliament and line ministries.
Using a mixed-methods design—combining PEFA scores, budget execution data, and key-informant interviews—we assess whether
incremental reforms can address structural bottlenecks or whether deeper political-economy constraints (such as limited legislative
scrutiny time and delayed implementation of audit recommendations) will continue to dilute efficiency gains. The paper concludes
with policy options for tightening the feedback loop between performance evaluation and resource allocation, thereby aligning
Uganda’s PEMS more closely with the country’s industrialization and poverty-reduction ambitions under Vision 2040.

We are a leading independent, nonpartisan research organization dedicated to advancing evidence-based policy solutions for sustainable economic development in Africa.

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Stay connected with IPRA’s quarterly newsletter featuring the latest news, book releases, and original content.

Newsletter Form (#4)

Become a Non-Resident Fellow

Copyright © 2025 Institute of Policy Research and Analysis. All rights reserved.